Kamala Harris is back under the political microscope — and this time, the criticism is coming from inside her own party.
A long-awaited Democratic “autopsy” of the 2024 election has reportedly laid out what went wrong in Harris’ failed presidential campaign, and the findings are not exactly flattering.
According to the explosive report, Democrats are still trying to figure out how the party blew its chance to stop Donald Trump from returning to the White House. But one thing is clear: Harris is taking a major share of the blame.
The report claims President Joe Biden and his White House failed to properly build Harris up during her years as vice president, leaving her badly exposed once she was suddenly pushed to the top of the ticket.
The document reportedly says the Biden administration “did not effectively support Vice President Harris over three and half years to improve her standing before the candidate switch.”
In other words, Democrats now appear to be admitting what critics had been saying for years: Harris was never positioned as a strong political force before she was asked to carry the entire party.
The report goes even further, suggesting the White House should have done more to make Harris a visible and trusted figure much earlier in Biden’s presidency.
“Had the White House explored and evaluated ways to leverage Kamala Harris earlier in the administration, perhaps it would have improved the President’s standing, and it certainly could have helped prepare her to lead the ticket,” the report states.
That failure may have proved devastating.
By the time Harris became the Democratic nominee, she was not just battling Trump. She was battling years of low visibility, weak public approval, and the perception that she had never truly connected with ordinary voters.
The report also takes aim at Democratic overconfidence.
Party insiders allegedly believed Trump was so damaged politically that voters would reject him on their own. Instead of making a stronger case for Harris, Democrats reportedly leaned too heavily on the idea that Trump was simply too controversial to win again.
That proved to be a costly gamble.
The report says Democrats struggled with a “persistent inability or unwillingness to listen to all voters,” especially in parts of the country where the party has long had trouble connecting with working-class Americans.
The message was simple: Democrats assumed too much, listened too little, and paid the price.
Harris was also reportedly criticized for taking key voting groups for granted.
According to the report, her campaign assumed Latino and Black voters would naturally fall in line behind her. But she ended up performing worse than Biden among young Latino men and young Black men, groups that Democrats had counted on heavily.
Instead, the report claims Harris focused too much of her campaign energy on women voters while failing to do enough to reach men in communities where support for Democrats had already been slipping.
That mistake became one of the most painful lessons of the race.
Online critics were even harsher.
One person in a Reddit discussion blasted the campaign’s message, writing, “Vote for Kamala, she’s better than Trump. Like ..how? We barely knew anything about her.”
The same commenter argued Democrats had years to introduce Harris to the country and failed to do it.
Another person wrote that Harris “would have never won even with more time,” claiming that a primary would have exposed how weak her support really was.
A third critic summed up the disaster in brutal fashion: “So basically, Kamala shot herself in one foot, and Biden shot her in the other.”
The report is also likely to fuel even more speculation about the tense relationship between Harris and Biden.
For months, Washington insiders whispered that the two had an icy partnership behind the scenes. Some claimed Harris was furious over how Biden handled his reelection plans and believed he had put her in an impossible position.
According to previous reports, Harris allegedly warned people privately that Biden was in serious political trouble before he finally stepped aside. At the same time, there were also claims Biden’s team had once considered replacing Harris on the ticket before everything collapsed.
One Democratic insider previously claimed the bad blood was real, saying, “Kamala hates Biden’s guts. She’s making the rounds telling anyone who’ll listen he’s a loser now — and in 2024.”
Whether those claims are true or just part of the usual Washington blame game, the new report makes one thing clear: Democrats are still fighting over who deserves the blame for Trump’s return to power.
Some believe Biden failed Harris by not preparing her for the national spotlight.
Others believe Harris was simply the wrong candidate, with the wrong message, at the wrong time.
Either way, the party’s post-election wounds are still wide open — and this report has only poured salt into them.
Discover more from Red News Nation
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

SHE DESERVES EVERY BIT OF IT AND MORE. SHE\’S A CRACK COCAINE SMOKING WHORE FROM CALIFORNIA
They didn’t dare give her more public exposure. She was as much of a disaster in front of the cameras and microphones as Biden was. Their shortcomings were different, but just as bad. He couldn’t keep mentally connected with the context of his speeches as well as acing as though he sometimes wasn’t aware of what was going on around him while on camera or possibly totally aware of where he physically was. And she, when speaking, would commence to babble in directions no one understood or had nothing to do with the main context of the speech. When the public did watch them on the TV, it was more for entertainment value than serious intake. Running either of them for reelection or election made about as much sense as it did for the Republican party to run Bob Dole back in the day, or McClain later on. One has to wonder about the mental midgets who are running either party in the back room. Trump, on the other hand, simply ran as Trump, not some professional politician. He ran on a platform of doing and saying what the people actually felt, not some concocted party platform that, in the end, usually misses the target completely as far as getting anything accomplished.