Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is under the spotlight again following her recent sale of Nvidia stock, valued between $1 million and $5 million, just weeks before the company’s shares plummeted. The dramatic decline came after the Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek unveiled a revolutionary ChatGPT rival developed for under $6 million, sending shockwaves through global markets.
On Monday, Nvidia suffered one of the most significant single-day losses in U.S. stock market history, with its market valuation shrinking by hundreds of billions. Investors reeled as DeepSeek, a previously little-known player in artificial intelligence, disrupted Nvidia’s dominance by delivering advanced AI tools at a fraction of the expected cost.
While Pelosi, 84, recovers from a hip replacement surgery in Luxembourg, her financial dealings are drawing sharp criticism. On New Year’s Eve, she sold 10,000 shares of Nvidia and offloaded 31,600 Apple shares worth between $5 million and $25 million. Shortly after, she invested in call options for Alphabet Inc. and Amazon, with each valued between $250,001 and $500,000.
Critics, including former President Donald Trump, allege Pelosi’s trading patterns demonstrate questionable timing. At a rally last September, Trump referenced another incident involving Visa stock.
“Nancy Pelosi and her husband sold Visa stock the day before the DOJ announced a lawsuit against the company. That’s not luck—it’s corruption,” Trump told the crowd. “She should be held accountable.”
Pelosi’s husband, Paul Pelosi, reportedly sold 2,000 Visa shares, valued between $500,000 and $1 million, mere days before the lawsuit surfaced.
Paul Pelosi has also been in the public eye for making $38 million worth of trades in the weeks leading up to Trump’s inauguration in 2017. These included the sale of $24 million in Apple shares and $5 million in Nvidia stock.
“Pelosi’s trading history raises serious ethical concerns,” said David Taylor, a financial analyst and author of Trading the Political Way. “Even if technically legal, the optics are damaging. It reinforces the perception of Washington insiders using their positions for financial gain.”
Supporters argue there’s no evidence of insider trading and point to disclosures mandated by the STOCK Act. A spokesperson for the Pelosi family dismissed allegations, saying, “All transactions comply with applicable laws. Attempts to politicize these actions are baseless.”
The controversy surrounding the Pelosi family isn’t new. Paul Pelosi endured a harrowing attack in their San Francisco home in October 2022, leaving him hospitalized with a fractured skull. Despite this, he joined health-tech company Tempus AI, which has since seen its stock surge.
As Nvidia’s dramatic downturn reverberates, questions surrounding the Pelosi family’s trades—and the broader ethical standards of lawmakers—will likely persist.
Does the timing of Pelosi’s trades warrant further investigation, or are these allegations politically motivated? The debate underscores growing frustration among Americans who feel disconnected from Washington elites.
Discover more from Red News Nation
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Martha Stewart went to prison for that. She needs to be next.
She’s a crook
I think the accuracy of the $6 million cost is disingenuous at best. Does it count money supplied by the Chinese govt? Or were govt supplied materials used in “programming” the “intelligence”? I understand basic questions that it was asked that referenced the Chinese govt were very inaccurately answered. Taiwan is a Chinese territory and the Tiananmen Square demonstrations never happened.
Nothing new here, those people in Congress, know when to sell or buy stock, I believe they called that insider trading, but only crooks do that, of course.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone